It’s simply too
BIG for the area

This is simply too big for the neighbourhood

  • ✽

    Over 30 metres tall

    That’s more than triple the expected height for the proposed R3 zoning — completely out of scale with the surrounding streetscape.

  • ✽

    Dominates the skyline

    These buildings would tower over neighbouring homes and change the character of Davies Street & Lords Road permanently.

    not to mention creating a double standard for residents of heritage-protected Haberfield, where additions that exceed existing roofline heights are strictly prohibited.

  • ✽

    Surrounded by low-rise homes

    Most nearby buildings are 1–2 storeys. This proposal doesn’t match the form or feel of the neighbourhood.

  • ✽

    Next to a primary school

    The site is very close to Kegworth Public School, yet the proposal overlooks the long-term impact on safety, noise, and learning conditions.

  • ✽

    Precedent Creep

    It sets a precedent for internal streets. This isn’t Parramatta Road — it’s a quiet street well beyond the main Parramatta corridor. Approving this scale here opens the door to similar proposals throughout Leichhardt’s residential heart.

  • ✽

    Doesn’t match R3 zoning intent

    Medium-density zoning usually supports townhouses or 2–3 storey apartments — not high-rise living.

Make your offical objection today

 FAQs

  • R3 zoning is generally intended for townhouses and 2–3 storey apartments. This proposal seeks 8 storeys and 30 metres in height, far exceeding what’s typical or expected in this zone.

  • The site is surrounded by single-storey homes, a school, and parks. A 30m tower would dominate the skyline, permanently altering the feel of the neighbourhood.

  • No. While not in a heritage zone, the height would break the treeline and be clearly visible from protected streets in Haberfield like Hawthorne Parade — areas where residents face strict height controls.

  • The proposal includes approximately 60 seniors housing units, which are cited to help justify the scale of the development. However, there is no formal assessment showing these dwellings meet the design, location, or eligibility requirements under the Seniors Housing SEPP. As such, the offer appears more like a strategic justification for uplift, rather than a fully compliant or deliverable aged care solution.

  • The proposed public open space narrows to around 12 metres in places, and is largely made up of shared paths and landscaped buffers. While it offers visual and passive amenity, there’s no evidence it meets Inner West Council or state guidelines for usable open space — particularly where flat, informal recreation space is needed.